Minecraft Wiki talk:Community portal: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

Content added Content deleted

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:30, 10 April 2025

Minecraft Wiki Community portal discussion page

Shortcuts

This is the community's main discussion page. Talk about anything wiki-related here!

This page is generally for community discussion about the wiki as a whole.

For in depth discussions on changing wiki policy, or large proposals that require the collaboration of multiple editors to implement and cover many pages please use the forum instead.
Wiki issue reports that require admin attention should go on the admin noticeboard.
Discussions about an individual page should go on its talk page.
Note that this page is NOT for suggesting new ideas about the game. That belongs on the feedback site.

Please post new topics at the bottom of the page by clicking the "add topic" button above, or using this input box:

List default item components in item articles

Latest comment: 6 March7 comments3 people in discussion

Ever since 24w09a introduced the component system, the game assigns certain components to every item in the game by default. Should these be listed on the items' pages? - User-12316399 (talk) 13:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, of course. KorayTehGOAT (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neutral: I'm actually not sure if the default components should be on each item page, as it would take a lot of work, even with a bot, to add the default components to all the items' pages. Furthermore, the information could be quite redundant, for example, on Bread, if we add the minecraft:food and minecraft:consumable components on the page, it is actually pointless as it's already mentioned that bread can be eaten and restores 5 hunger, etc. I understand that the reader might not understand the components, but that's why Data component format is a page. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:17, 2 January 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perhaps, however a lot of information could be considered redundant anyway (e.g. most namespaced IDs already effectively duplicate the item name). If showing this information could prove confusing or bloat the page, we could make it collapsed by default. - User-12316399 (talk) 11:25, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure. It's still a huge change and definitely needs bot actions, so we should wait for more opinions first. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK. KorayTehGOAT (talk) 16:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On this topic, have we comprehensively listed item tags on item pages yet? This may be something worth pursuing before or alongside this. - User-12316399 (talk) 00:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uploading enchanted item textures

Latest comment: 8 March17 comments6 people in discussion

I don't really understand how to upload enchanted item textures. The texture files don't have them separately, and I don't know how to make the enchantment glint overlay. Since the files actually use a bunch of pngs to represent each frame, and not gifs, so I can't just overlay it. I'm asking because I want to reupload File:Enchanted Mace.gif, which currently looks horrendous. I don't want to pay for Adobe After Effects just for a gif. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 23:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nerdyguy2000: Do you know how to do this? I mean, I trust you with technical things now, and I know you're active right now. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 03:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't, sorry. I actually don't even know how to see the game files (probably because I only play on mobile/console), and I have no idea how to get renders (probably for a similar reason; I edit on mobile and my phone doesn't support png files). I do know that it's possible to make a gif with separate files, or as least my device is able to make jpgs into gifs. I also once heard that gifs don't support translucency, maybe that's why it's a bunch of pngs in the game files, I dunno. I really don't know a lot, but right now I'm trying to help as much as I can with my limited knowledge. I apologize that I can't be more help, though yeah, that mace gif does need reuploading (unless it's not possible to improve it, which I doubt). -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 03:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh okay. You can't actually get the game files easily, you need to download Java and stuff. I get the files from https://www.mcasset.cloud, which has the files extracted for me already. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 03:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, I see. I do hope my comment helped at least a bit, though. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 03:28, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

By the way, by downloading Java, I mean downloading the program at java.com, not downloading Java Edition. Also I just realised I wrote a run-ons sentence. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 03:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I wanted to cover an alternative process at User:BabylonAS/Creating enchanted item images with Krita, but I wait until Leo768 provides replacement glint frames that are consistent with 1.19.4+ default settings (50% speed, 75% intensity). Also, Krita itself has an issue with exporting animations at certain formats: re-opening the export settings resets them, and in case of WebP, the lossless option doesn’t work properly (I have doubts that the resulting images would fit within GIF’s 255 colors limitation). Babylon AS 08:46, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, why does the enchanted mace texture look horrendous? I don't get why someone uploaded that image; is there a reason why the enchanted mace is hard to do? --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 09:08, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Likely in-game footage, like someone actually recorded the enchanted mace on an inventory, in the game, and then crop it, and upload it into Minecraft Wiki. Most accurate and simplest way to do it if you ask me :P Outrowed (talk) 10:28, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh okay. So it's simply low resolution. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 10:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, I actually finish recording the glint on the black texture item. But since they're screenshots from the game, I had trouble sorting them. -- Leo768 (talk) 10:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What do you mean by that? I don't understand why is sorting hard; isn't it just one recording? Use some Chinese if necessary; I speak Chinese decently well so it's actually easier to understand for me when compared to how some people speak English as a second language. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 10:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To record the glint cycle, I use a program to take 1650 consecutive screenshots in the game as the frames. So the problem is which frame should be used as the first frame of the looping animation. -- Leo768 (talk) 11:40, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, since it's looped, any could work. Just make sure the order is correct. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Leo768: Is this done now? I feel like the enchanted mace should be reuploaded ASAP because it would be quite confusing as a reader why Mace doesn't have the enchanted image, as other tool pages, such as Iron Pickaxe, do. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 05:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

https://minecraft.wiki/w/User:MrJam003/Animated_Sprites_Render#Enchanted_item_animations Use this - StizzurpXDD 146.196.34.18 10:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For one, it has outdated glint frames (default settings have changed in 1.19.4); two, the user doesn’t want to use payware for a single file. Babylon AS 10:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Latin translation

Latest comment: 1 March1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm wondering if there should be a Latin translation project. I kinda want to start one, but I want to make sure it doesn't break rules first, as Latin is a dead language, so it might work differently. My reasoning is that you can play Java Edition in Latin, as well as that we have a lzh (Literary Chinese, but really it's just ancient Chinese as no one actually speaks like that, it's 文言文) wiki. After seeing that the Latin Wikipedia (or rather, Vicipaedia) exists, I think we should create a Latin wiki. My Latin level is only about A1, so I can't write that much content, but maybe I can write some basic sentences. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 01:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How to add a photo to your account

Latest comment: 2 March5 comments5 people in discussion

Hey I made my account for Minecraft Wiki extremely recently and I was wondering how to add a photo Pokemonster (talk) 03:44, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is no option to add a profile picture. This is because of privacy reasons as far as I know. -

StizzurpXDD^(talk) 03:57, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You cannot add a profile picture. We had this back on Fandom, but it wasn't added here. You will need a user infobox, or add a picture. 148.72.172.244 04:38, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want add an image to your user page, click "Insert" and "Images and media". Then you can search for an existing image or upload your own here (write [[Category:User images]] in summary). If you want similar box as many pages, click "Insert" and "Template", type "Infobox profile" and fill the fields you want (you can add more fields, such as "Image" with the checkboxes left).

Miner(

talk

contributions) 08:33, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, you can add an image to your user page as said by Miner, or add one in your signature (if you want I can provide details on how to, but I don't want to write an unnecessarily long explanation yet). Unlike Fandom, profile pictures don't exist here. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:12, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Page delete

Latest comment: 5 March2 comments2 people in discussion

You should have to delete the disambiguation page "20100131", it has been unused since its creation 185.100.244.83 22:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is something that should be on the Admin noticeboard, not here. Also, the page is already up for deletion. I'm not sure if that was you or not, but still.

PhoenixAsh89 (talk) (contribs) 22:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interactive viewer for panoramas

Latest comment: 6 March3 comments3 people in discussion

Currently, the Panorama page just has the six texture files laid out as the net of a cube. Perhaps it would be better if some sort of embedded interactive display could be created for use on the page, which would compile each of the six texture files into the interior of a cube, like is done in-game? By default, this would rotate at the normal speed, but could be clicked and dragged to change the viewpoint at will. - User-12316399 (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've thought about that, having some panorama thing for fun. The unfolded cube thing is really quite annoying for me.

PhoenixAsh89 (talk) (contribs) 00:54, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I quite like this idea. It'd be cool to see old panoramas as they were rather than... How we currently do it. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 01:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interactive Langton's Ant demo

Latest comment: 8 March6 comments3 people in discussion

Since the wiki has been hosting several tools as of recently, such as Chunkbase embeds and other utilities at Calculators, I think it may also be a good idea to have an interactive simulation that could be added to the An Ant page, so people can see how the block works without having to actually load into the snapshot.

This could be done relatively easily if we were to embed a simulation program such as LifeViewer, and possibly an associated template (the conwaylife wiki uses this). We could then place a viewer embed on the page similarly to this:

{{EmbedViewer |rle = x = 1, y = 1, rule = Langtons-Ant B! |viewerconfig = [[ ICONS AUTOSTART GPS 2 ]] |position = center }}

Whether we would want to inline the rule data after the pattern file, or introduce a new Rule: namespace for rule files like the LifeWiki does, is probably up to the community to decide, since we could end up using viewer embeds for demonstrating other things about the game (for example fluids spreading, leaf adjacency, farmland hydration, and possibly some simple redstone contraptions).

Any opinions? - User-12316399 (talk) 00:12, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure if this is really necessary, especially because we could just link to a website that simulates this (my favourite of these websites is this). Also apparently there is a Rule namespace, it's just empty. Can someone explain in simple terms what this Rule namespace is for? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 00:21, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Much the same could probably be said about the existing chunkbase embeds, since we could externally link in those cases as well.

A Rule: namespace would be used for hosting custom ruletable data for things that aren't built-in (which would be most of the things we'd use it for), especially if said rules are going to be used across multiple different pages. - User-12316399 (talk) 00:26, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The current Rule namespace is created by Semantic MediaWiki (SMW for short), which is what we use to move data around the wiki such as villager trades and crafting recipes. SMW documentation literally says the Rule namespace is "currently not used" so its not really clear what its meant to be used for. Mudscape talk 00:33, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think since An Ant is only available in an april fools snapshot it is not worth the implementation cost to embed an entire interactive calculator. Both having a gif of how the ant works and/or a link to a simulation website sounds like a great way to improve the page though. Mudscape talk 00:36, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A demo should now be present at An Ant#Usage - please mention here if it works or not. - User-12316399 (talk) 02:14, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Naming scheme for Minecraft Live pages

Latest comment: 6 March2 comments2 people in discussion

We've always had pages called "Minecraft Live 20xx", but now that it's semiannual, what will the pages be called? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 01:12, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That discussion is currently happening at Talk:Minecraft Live (March 2025) Mudscape talk 01:15, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

View MCW #en/editors feed with a Zulip account

Latest comment: 9 March5 comments4 people in discussion

I created a Zulip account to view the MCW discord several weeks or months ago. On the meta:Zulip page, it says there is a feed for the #editors channel alongside #wiki-requests. These channels don't seem to be available or visible after creating a zZlip account. Previously in discord, active editors could use #editor-verification to access the editor specific channels. Is there any way to do the same functionality on Zulip to enable the same channels? Delvin4519 (talk) 04:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First verify from a discord account and then connect/sync your account to zulip for all the channels. 2401:4900:A4C9:F64B:0:0:258F:C5F 06:18, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not using discord right now, so that method does not work. Delvin4519 (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey there, I've manually added you to those channels considering there is only one account matching your nickname. Frisk (talk) 16:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently no automated way to get access yet. You can just ask an admin (or Frisk) on Zulip directly to gain access. --

MarkusRost (talk) 16:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion request

Latest comment: 6 March3 comments2 people in discussion

I don't need my Chat-Forum this can be deleted -~- Tiefsee (talk) (contribs) 18:40, 24 February 2025 (UTC) Reply[reply]

Tag it with {{delete}}. Deletion requests should also be on the admin noticeboard, not here. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 07:07, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I tagged already with {{delete}} -~-(Tiefsee) (talk) (Edits)

Done -~-

Tiefsee (talk) (contribs) 18:40, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Reply[reply]

Name changing

Latest comment: 7 March16 comments5 people in discussion

I want my username to be changed from this number-letter gibberish to a normal one (Cembalako365) and still want to keep all the contributions I made. How can it be done? 2401:4900:A501:E303:0:0:25A8:63D 10:15, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are currently not logged into an account, thus your IP address is displayed as your user name. You can create an account with your desired username using Special:CreateAccount. -

Delycache ^{(Talk | Contributions)} 10:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don’t want to create an account. Fandom wiki sites steal my data always. I got hacked 3 times previous year. 2401:4900:A471:8F14:0:0:25AA:9C3C 12:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This wiki is independent from Fandom. We forked from the Fandom Minecraft wiki back in 2023.

If you create an account it is only used for this Minecraft wiki and it’s counterparts in other languages.

You can read about the usage of your data in our host Weird Gloop‘s privacy policy: https://weirdgloop.org/privacy/

If you are concerned about your account getting hacked, you can enable two-factor authentication: Special:Manage Two-factor authentication

-

Delycache ^{(Talk | Contributions)} 12:28, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So can weird gloop see my IP and password. I remember than most wiki have checkuser plugin. 2401:4900:A471:8F14:0:0:25AA:9C3C 12:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This wiki is independent from Fandom. If you don't create an account, you cannot change your username, so make your decision. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:29, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So can weird gloop see my IP and password. I remember than most wiki have checkuser plugin. 2401:4900:A471:8F14:0:0:25AA:9C3C 12:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think so. But right now, we can all see your IP, as that's what your numbers and letters are. Not to scare you or anything, but anyone can literally Google which city you're in, or figure it out by just clicking a few links. That's why it's recommended to create accounts. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:34, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To add to that, yes Users with MCW:Check user permission can see the IP addresses that are used by a specific user account. The usage of this permission is described in Weird Gloop‘s Check user policy -

Delycache ^{(Talk | Contributions)} 12:40, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So how can I transfer my contributions to my new account Cembalako365? 2401:4900:A471:8F14:0:0:25AA:9C3C 12:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think that's possible, but really, 10 edits is very insignificant, as most established users have thousands of edits. Click my user page link, or that of the other users here, to see what I mean. This is my 2,131st edit, for example. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:48, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you serious? I am admitted in a hospital right now, this is not my private IP. 2401:4900:A471:8F14:0:0:25AA:9C3C 12:40, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah. I know the wiki internally knows the IP of even registered users, because it has a function of blocking a user and their IP, so they can't continue editing disruptively by logging out. You're IP becomes public if you log out mainly to be able to manage blocking vandals, as they can be identified by their IP. I think Weird Gloop is trustworthy. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:44, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Really? You thought we are still on Fandom? 🤔 — Babylon AS 12:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As per BabylonAS, see Minecraft Wiki:Moving from Fandom. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 12:31, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have to create an account. You're currently editing as your IP address. Unfortunately, I don't think you can retain the contributions. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 11:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links in navboxes

Latest comment: 9 March1 comment1 person in discussion

I stumbled across this revision which adds external links to Fabric and Liteloader's project homepages to {{Navbox modding resources}}. I thought this was strange, since navboxes are usually used for navigation within a wiki, but then I also noticed {{Mods}}, which links to Microsoft's BE Add-On documentation. Given that, I want to ask what this wiki's attitude regarding this is. Are external links generally accepted in navboxes? When, in particular, might one want to use them/avoid using them? Thanks! Much More Infinite (talk) 00:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

please restart hungarian translation project

Latest comment: 11 March7 comments5 people in discussion

please Adibalogh (talk) 14:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

i woud love to help Adibalogh (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can start new translation project here

Miner(

talk

contributions) 14:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may try to take care of the original Hungarian wiki, which is still at Fandom, and get it forked here. Unlike the other unfortunate wikis (Czech, Greek, and Turkish), the Hungarian one was founded in 2011, making it the only pre-Gamepedia wiki (i. e. founded before late 2013) that has not been forked yet. (The Polish wiki is somewhere else, its story is complicated and unpleasant.) Babylon AS 14:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, as to my knowledge I need to be an admin to fork a wiki on fandom and as I can gather the admins on the Hungarian fandom minecraft wiki are basically nonexistent. What should I so? Adibalogh (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a process to "adopt" a wiki on Fandom in the event that there are no bureaucrats or admins. See Adoption:Requests and Help:Adopting a community on Fandom. There appear to be certain requirements such as no active bureaucrats or admins for at least 60 days (I checked the wiki and think this is true), and you have to be an active contributor to the wiki you want to adopt. Rampage455 (talk) 20:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I need to be an admin to fork a wiki on fandom - no. Anyone can export pages there. Arina (she/her) 09:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question from a newbie

Latest comment: 11 March2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! I am DoctorePothole from Terraria Wiki. As you know, most self hosted wikis have their own Wiki Text. I am having trouble finding it, so if someone can help me out. DoctorePothole (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Minecraft Wiki! Here is our respective Wikitext - Minecraft Wiki Text. -

StizzurpXDD^(talk) 11:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uploaded my first image

Latest comment: 11 March1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey there guys, i uploaded my first image (Classic 0.0.23a Inventory.png), and added to the page, it contains all available blocks included in c0.0.23a_01 Amin Beqiri (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MC Dungeons texture filenames

Latest comment: 12 March2 comments2 people in discussion

I noticed that Dungeons texture filenames are following 2 different naming conventions. Some filenames begin with a T_, but some instead have (Dungeons...Texture) appended to the title. Would it not be better if they all followed the same naming convention?

Ferretwings (talk) 01:31, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't understand the naming convention of "T ..." prefix though. It seems to me they're the least informative way to indicate Dungeons textures. The "(Dungeons ... Texture)" is better. Outrowed (talk) 08:09, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Changing button icon in MediaViewer

Latest comment: 12 March3 comments3 people in discussion

It is better to change the share button icon in the MediaViewer to be just an arrow, which is more widely used icon for it. This can be done through MediaViewer targeted stylesheet. DoctorePothole (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An arrow with no box? That seems much more ambiguous of an icon, and I don’t remember seeing just an arrow used as a sharing icon on social media or other places. - Harristic / Talk

06:00, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not "arrow", but right arrow specifically is used as a sharing icon on YouTube and Reddit. Not all of popular social medias use it though, Twitter, Bluesky, and Instagram are different. Outrowed (talk) 10:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Something was update from zh

Latest comment: 14 March2 comments2 people in discussion

zh:Tutorial:饥饿管理is be different with Tutorial:Hunger_management.Shall we move? Rexlex T-C 12:51, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't understand what you mean. The only different on Chinese wiki is that the food section has been expanded. -- Leo768 (talk) 01:34, 14 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Potential Concept redesign?

Latest comment: 13 March1 comment1 person in discussion

Moved to Forum:Icons redesign. Arina (she/her) 18:10, 13 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Idea for new calculator

Latest comment: 16 March6 comments2 people in discussion

I don't want to just slap this on the calculator project page, I want to discuss my idea. Just note: this isn't an idea for the main game, it's for MCD.

Anyway, my idea is a calculator for ancient hunts; what are the ancients that might respond to specific items, how many ancients might respond based on the enchantment points sacrificed, the chances of getting any ancient, how many times a specific ancient might respond, the chance of any given door leading to an ancient dungeon as opposed to a gold room, maybe some calculations based on difficulty, etc.

So, what do you think about my idea? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 18:32, 14 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Replying here in an attempt to draw attention to my comment; I really think this idea has potential. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 04:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Soft support because I don't think calculators for MCD exist much if at all. I recently started playing MCD to try something new, and completed a few missions, but still haven't unlocked ancient hunts yet, so I'm not sure what they are; I don't know much about MCD yet so I might change my mind. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 06:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Nerdyguy2000 I change that now to a

Strong support. I just unlocked ancient hunts just then when playing MCD, and realized how useful that is. I don't have enough equipment to enter a hunt yet, but now I see that the sacrificed items and what it leads to is like calculating enchantments in the main game, so it should be good. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 08:32, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, I assume you now understand how complicated it is with all the runes and the ancients and the chances etc. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 14:13, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay, I have some concept art here, just for some basic info on what it would roughly look like. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 15:55, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Drawing attention to a discussion

Latest comment: 15 March4 comments3 people in discussion

What is the process to draw attention to a discussion on this wiki? Do I just post it here? Justjourney (talk) 04:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I mean, there's requests for comment (on the main community portal page), but I've tried those; they don't really work anymore. What discussion are you trying to draw attention to? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 14:15, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll post it below Justjourney (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, the community talk page is one of the active discussion on Minecraft Wiki. There is no formal process to draw attention in here, other than RfC (which is rarely ever gets attention anyway), so you can just freely post or request whatever you want. There are also other places for active wiki discussion, such as the MCW:Forum and Minecraft Wiki Discord. The forum is mainly used for major proposals and evolving some ideas/changes for the wiki, the Discord discussions on the other hand are more casual. Outrowed (talk) 14:24, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see...

Latest comment: 15 March1 comment1 person in discussion

Please see the discussion at Talk:Minecraft_Store#Capitalization. Justjourney (talk) 17:09, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

rv test edit

Latest comment: 16 March2 comments2 people in discussion

I've reverted edit Special:Diff/2897109 by an ip user. Should I warn them using something like {{Uw-test}}? Justjourney (talk) 17:34, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do whatever you think is necessary, but I'm not sure if IP users will check their talk page. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 06:03, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Block Renders Copyright Question

Latest comment: 18 March8 comments4 people in discussion

Copyright Question

I want to use block and item renders for my YouTube tutorials. However, I hope to monetize my videos in the future. The general copyright license for this forum is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0, meaning no commercial usage unless otherwise stated, and a mandatory attribution. However, I believe block and item renders specifically would fall under “unless otherwise stated” because these are specifically the property of Mojang Studios and under a different license. As stated for the wiki’s debris block licensing section, “this file (or parts of it) is copyright Mojang Studios. Though copyrighted, this screenshot, texture, audio, song, or other Mojang asset, or derivative of Mojang assets, is freely usable on this wiki.”

This aligns with what I’ve read on the Minecraft Usage Guidelines, which states:

“We don't own the original stuff that you create. We will however own things that are copies (or substantial copies) or derivatives of our property and creations - but if you create original things, they aren't ours. So, as an example:

a single Minecraft block (including its textures and its ‘look and feel’) - we own that;
your creation of a Gothic Cathedral with a rollercoaster running through it - we don't own that.”

In other words, if I understand correctly, block renders, as derivatives of Minecraft textures, belong exclusively to Mojang Studios. This seems to suggest that third parties cannot add restrictions to their use; only borrow them under Mojang’s terms like any other party, since third parties have no ownership claim under Mojang’s terms.

In sum, any copyright matters pertaining to the use and required attribution of block renders specifically would be under the exclusive jurisdiction of Mojang.

Is there something I’m missing? Obviously there’s still the matter of whether Mojang specifically allows use of the renders in monetized YouTube tutorials (which is hard to deduce in this case) - I was wondering about the Wiki and its policies specifically TheCedric (talk) 00:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Necessary I'm Not A Lawyer disclaimer, just my best understanding of copyrights: You are correct in your understanding there. Renders that use official textures made and owned by Mojang means they hold copyrights. Rendering them in special way is unlikely to be transformative enough to add a copyright of its own, so we assume copyrights belong to Mojang as per https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/usage-guidelines. Wiki cannot really add anything onto that, though if you plan to use renders from the wiki, it'd still be a nice gesture to credit contributors/link to the file page. Frisk (talk) 00:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My main fear with attribution is if a contributor misunderstands the process I used to reach the conclusion I did and attempts to file a copyright strike against me, thinking I violated the blanket forum license. They’d have proof of proper credit but if it were monetized they could also assume I’m using the work improperly and wield that attribution in tandem with the blanket license against me to build a stronger case. Basically, “this is clear proof that it’s mine and the wiki says what’s on their site can’t be used in a commercial capacity, therefore this guy is breaking copyright rules.” TheCedric (talk) 00:59, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd say that closer to the truth is that all textual content is in CC BY-NC-SA 3.0, images are often from other places or with content copyrighted by Mojang, minority of images are probably under CC or assigned other license (like our logo or styling elements for the website). Our copyright status in the footer clearly states "Content on this site is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted;", images most often fall under that unless otherwise noted.

As to editor filing a copyright takedown, I'd say that's rather unlikely. I believe most of our editors uploading renders are aware of this license situation. I've not heard of any copyright claim by uploaders of the wiki, even though those renders are used A LOT by content creators and sometimes even Mojang themselves. So eh, I commend you for checking all the necessary copyright related information before using assets, but from side of the wiki contributors I really don't think you have anything to worry about regarding usage of Minecraft asset renders. Frisk (talk) 09:54, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Frisk beat me to it but I'll comment anyway(in agreement). I am 99% sure that the license mentioned on the file page supersedes the blanket license of CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. We can't exactly relicense something that we don't own in the first place, since like Mojang says, they still own the single Minecraft block. Mudscape talk 00:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you guys so much. Navigating copyright as just a layperson is a nightmare. You’re right, Frisk, adding the credits would be a kind gesture so I think I’ll do that. I just don’t know how else to get images of blocks except through low-quality, zoomed-in screenshots from the game or taking from the textures folder itself (which would be 2D and partial unless I figured out how to model them). I’ve messed with 3D modeling software a little before (Unity) and it’s daunting stuff TheCedric (talk) 00:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I recall there was some ancient practice of dual-licensing block renders both under Mojang and under Creative Commons. Obviously that isn’t correct, and I’m sure all such cases are long gone. Babylon AS 10:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Interestingly, as I was making one of my tutorials today, I found that the enderchest render still lists the dual license: File:Ender Chest JE2 BE2.gif#mw-jump-to-license

I ended up not using this anyway because the file was incompatible with my editor, but it is unique in that it’s a gif instead of a still.

I imagine this is still unintentional/incorrect but I instantly remembered this thread when I found it. I’m pretty new to the wiki scene so I’m really not sure how to change it and don’t want to mess it up on the off chance it’s still correct. TheCedric (talk) 01:41, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Self Nominating for Patroller Rights

Latest comment: 20 March20 comments9 people in discussion

Moved from Forum:Self Nominating for Patroller Rights

Nomination declined following usage of unchecked machine translations. --

MarkusRost (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I want to nominate myself for patroller rights. I’ve been part of this community since March 2024 and have made many contributions to the wiki. I’ve handled a lot of vandalism and disruptive edits. Patroller rights will help me deal with these problems faster, especially with the Rollback feature. I already spend time checking recent changes, so I can patrol edits as I go. Having patroller rights would also encourage me to work even harder to keep the wiki safe and well-maintained. - StizzurpXDD^(talk) 07:07, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neutral I just... Haven't seen you around reverting vandalism really, so I don't think I can provide any good opinion. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 14:10, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Strong Support | I see Patroller not as a rank but as a responsibility which StizzurpXDD is ready to take up. He clearly has been active on discord and forums and has been making some vital constructive edits. He already has Auto-Patrol rights and over four thousand edits. I have seen him actively reverting vandalisms in the past and also in the recent days. I don't think there is any problem with him getting the rights.

(talk) 08:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Strong oppose – Patrollers should follow the wiki rules and not write low-quality articles with AI (or at the very least AI-like) slop. Patrollers are not only there to fight vandalism but to ensure that articles on the wiki are correct and high quality. | violine1101 ^(talk) 16:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article you are mentioning is not written with AI at all. If you feel it is written too formally then it is probably because I write English formally (or atleast it looks too formal to native english speakers). I will not get into the AI discussion again, I've already explained hundreds of times that I don't use it. Plus, that's not the only article I've written and not even the only page I wrote recently. Take Taking Inventory, Block of the Month, Block of the Week and also one of my most extensively researched page, Event Server Test. Take Around the Minecraft World in 80 Biomes, Dev Diaries, Minecraft Monthly (episode summaries), How We Make Minecraft, Minecraft: The Great Wild (completion) and many more. If I used AI so extensively to create low quality slop, how was I able to create these pages? The simple answer is, I don't use AI but instead write everything myself. Also, I can make mistakes. If some article to you feels low quality, you can correct it, I'm not stopping you or neither is anyone else. I've no intrest in going against wiki rules for absolutely no reason. -

StizzurpXDD^(talk) 17:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This weak explanation and deflection from a genuine problem is very uninspiring. No one said that you used AI in your other articles. You used AI for the Reach article. You used AI and you should own your mistakes. GIM Dianliang233 (talk) 07:24, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't know how can I explain you that I don't use AI. If I didn't specify it in my comment above, I will do it now—I have not used AI to write the Reach page at all, and definitely not GenAI. Why will I own up to a mistake I've not even committed? Why would I own up to a mistake that doesn’t even exist? To satisfy someone's ego? Definitely not. The only problem here is that there is a prejudice against me just because I used AI for a few edits and a Rfa proposal during the very first days I joined this wiki as an editor, before the GENAI rules were created; this is uninspiring. -

StizzurpXDD^(talk) 11:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This doesn't explain why you were deflecting from the main argument, presenting random pages you made.

CaishenZhēn233 (talk) 07:43, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The point I was trying to explain by listing some of the articles I've created was to tell that if I was so dependent on the use of AI and couldn't create a page without using it, how was I able to create all these other pages which have not been changed at all. I was trying to prove why I've not used AI in the Reach page. Also, I saw someone on Discord saying that the heading were AI-like. When making all the other articles, I usually have a starting point, something to refer to. For the Reach page, I had nothing for reference. So I used Breaking, the page previously linked as a redirect in the Reach page, as a reference. This can be seen through the first heading, 'Mechanics of Reach', which was choosen by me through the first heading of the Breaking page, 'Basics of Breaking'. There are also other things that match with it, but you can compare the two pages yourself or this comment would go on for too long. -

StizzurpXDD^(talk) 09:17, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The "reach" article and the way it's written has several very clear indicators that it's not 100% human-written, but that's beside the point. I don't even care about whether you've actually used AI or not to write that article. It's clear that you have not proofread the article at all, since there's multiple mistakes with templates. Additionally, it's not written in the same style as the rest of the wiki, instead it's using language that is overly formal, as well as bullet points rather than prose. A lot of facts are repeated multiple times in the article in multiple sections for no apparent reason. Again, all of those are indicators for AI usage but even if they aren't, it's just a poor-quality article.

I appreciate you giving a list of other articles you've (partially) written, but that's not at all relevant to my argument. (that being said we should probably go through these as well and do a quality assessment of your summaries) | violine1101 ^(talk) 16:50, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Btw the same issues are present in the today-written Melee Attack article. Arina (she/her) 20:20, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And as MakrusRost figured out, this was an unchecked machine translation of a Chinese article. Arina (she/her) 20:35, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here, take more articles I've written:

Minecraft: Shape Your World, Moving House, The Deep Dark Makeover, The Nether and I, Rooted Together, Minecraft 15 years!, Spawn Point Stories, DANGER: SCARY MOB SPOTTED IN SEAS!, and many more. Do these look low quality to you? -

StizzurpXDD^(talk) 17:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oppose - concerning English knowledge, as admitted by the candidate themselves. Arina (she/her) 18:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Concerning English knowledge? I never said I'm bad at English, I'm very fluent actually. I said I write English formally, or atleast it will feel like formal for native-english speakers. -

StizzurpXDD^(talk) 01:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, so it won't feel natural. And that's actually a big problem. Arina (she/her) 08:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think this is not a problem at all. There is no article that StizzurpXDD has made that lacks any sort of english fluency. You claim that he "admitted" that he lacks english fluency which Stizzurp denies, which makes your argument already irrelevant. I don't think there is any edit made by Stizzurp which lacks proper english.

(talk) 10:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support. I met him in discord where he was stopping wrong doers extremely fast. According to him he keeps his recent changes open all the time which is dedication. (https://discord.com/channels/447104142729674753/685553918465540270/1345635501960466452) NovaSquare (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Weak support I can give my support from what persons are saying but cause I have not seen them myself, the max i can give is a weak support.

CaishenZhēn233 (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cs wiki does not work

Latest comment: 17 March3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi,

Im from Czech Republic and I want to has got this wiki in Czech but cs.minecraft.wiki doesn’t work

Please contact me on my personal mail:

mimrpim@gmail.com

thank you

Mimrpim 2A09:BAC2:275F:137:0:0:1F:3C 14:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And @Mimrpim is my user account but please write on my mail Mimrpim (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mimrpim see this

Miner(

talk

contributions) 14:38, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AI-generated replies?

Latest comment: 18 March9 comments6 people in discussion

How to deal with AI-generated replies? Should I just remove them and warn the user, or do what? Arina (she/her) 15:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This gives no indication to me of being AI generated. You certainly shouldn't be removing comments of an established community member solely on one person claiming it to be AI. Mudscape talk 15:28, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This feedback essentially contains two proposals and the feedback provider is requesting that one be implemented. The first is that villager trade tables be added to the Villager page, and the second is that the redirects for the villager professions (Cleric, Librarian, etc.) be changed from Villager#Professions to the appropriate section of Trading. Note: the outcome of this discussion may be influenced by another discussion on this talk page about whether to split the Villager page so each profession has its own page.

is very clearly AI-generated in my opinion. Arina (she/her) 15:42, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seems like Rampage being themselves to me. They’re generally very good at communicating in my experience. -BrianGLHF (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It is written very matter-of-fact, however it's not enough to tell for sure something is output of AI gen model, I doubt in this case it was. Frisk (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There are some major indicators that it isn't ai. 1) it sounds like rampage. So either they have been using an AI for months when doing good rewrites of technical pages, or that's just how they sound. 2) The response uses words and phrases that are not in the original feedback, such as "trade table", giving examples of villager professions, and linking to a subsection of a page. 3) It references another ongoing relevant discussion on the page.

If rampage has an AI that can produce clear, cohesive, and helpful responses like this I would request they share it with the rest of us! Mudscape talk 15:53, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, that really sounds like Rampage just doin' his thing and being a good user. Also, I find that generally AI uses weird words to make things sound more detailed when it really just makes it more confusing. I can see why it might seem a little like AI though. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 23:13, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I replied to your comment on the Villager talk page, but I didn't realize that you also posted something here till now. No, it's not AI-generated, just me. Rampage455 (talk) 23:35, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Resolved. Arina (she/her) 07:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How can i extract entity models from version games files and convert them to bbmodels

Latest comment: 18 March3 comments2 people in discussion

Reason : Solved

How can I extract entity models from version game files and convert them into bbmodel file. assets/models doesn't have entity sub-folder at all. Where are the models located and how can i convert it to bbmodel. Please help.

(talk) 10:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maybe not definitive answer, because models might differ between editions, but for Bedrock you can get models directly from sample resourcepack at addon's templates section - model are located in models/entity folder and opening them as-is in blockbench will allow for importing additional data (like animations). As for Java Edition - you will have to decompile game's code because models are hardcoded. Oakar567 (talk) 11:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. I really appreciate your help.

(talk) 12:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Isn't this user a long-term abuser?

Latest comment: 19 March3 comments3 people in discussion

Reason: 69.18.14.67 has been permanently banned

69.18.14.67, Spammed on numerous sites, including Miraheze, Mario Wiki, Terraria Wiki, and even Wikipedia. 23.81.206.160 00:00, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:69.18.14.67 is already blocked ~~for 3 months, though we should be wary of the user's actions after that.~~ permanently. Outrowed (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2025 (UTC) (Last edited on 00:05, 19 March 2025 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Indeed it appears so, they're blocked for the third time it looks like. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 00:03, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image for return button on mouse

Latest comment: 19 March1 comment1 person in discussion

There should be an image (like File:Mouse 1.svg) for the fifth mouse button (return button, appears on some mouses). This is needed because it is the default control for Menu Cancel in Bedrock Edition, which needs an image in Controls#Bedrock Edition (it says BUTTON5 now). I don't know how to make such an image, so can someone else make it? MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk)(contribs) 16:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Condensing archives?

Latest comment: 23 March9 comments6 people in discussion

Currently, there are 2 separate archives of this page for January and February of this year - Minecraft Wiki talk:Community portal/Archive 44 and Minecraft Wiki talk:Community portal/Archive 45 respectively. But monthly archives have never been the case here. Should I merge them if the total size of an archive for January and February will be 150 kb? Arina (she/her) 16:44, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes but do it correctly please. NovaSquare (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Resolved.

CaishenZhēn233 (talk) 06:18, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not resolved as there's no consensus. Arina (she/her) 07:29, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Something so small and irrelevant need a consensus?

CaishenZhēn233 (talk) 07:42, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Strong Support | These should be merged. Also, all archives for subsequent months should be merged instead of being made into separate archives.

🔷

(talk) 07:55, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ehm... they should be condensed, but only if they're not large enough to be a single archive. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 14:16, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ideally an archive should cover at least two months worth of content. If the current talk page gets pretty long (like 60+ sections), then you should merge it to existing archives. Outrowed (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'd say part of the February archive could be merged into the January one, but a lot of it would probably have to be in a separate archive. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 18:39, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How do I make isometric screenshots like the ones that are seen throughout the wiki?

Latest comment: 23 March3 comments2 people in discussion

How do you guys make them like that? Do you take the textures of the block or something and put them together? 4ngryth3fan (talk) 13:28, 22 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

See Help:Isometric renders. This page have all information you need. TLDR: There are few method, where most popular ones involve using 3D modeling software or taking a screenshot directly in-game via mods or special resourcepack Oakar567 (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. 4ngryth3fan (talk) 15:54, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Movie sprites

Latest comment: 23 March2 comments2 people in discussion

I think when the AMCM live event comes out, we should make sprites for the movie using the server resource pack textures. Buzzilaa (talk) 18:24, 22 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is what I’ve been planning, any official DLC will be used for sprites. Hopefully as soon as the event starts we can receive a dump and replace all the placeholders. I’d also like to pull from Aotearoa New Zealand, already there’s a kiwi sprite, but it’s not as directly tied to the film so it won’t be as useful. Realshow19 (talk) 05:52, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki background

Latest comment: 23 March7 comments3 people in discussion

Moved from Forum:Wiki background

How did the admins make the wiki background? It really looks amazing, in which makes me want to know what app they used to make it? Bartomelow (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Actually, I believe majority if not all of the wiki backgrounds have been made by User:Oakar567 - who isn't an administrator of English Minecraft Wiki (but is an administrator of unrelated Polish one). I think he is the right person to answer your question. I just know that in creation of many of those assets he was using: Inkscape, Paint.NET, GIMP, Krita and lately even Blender (at least for our funny ugly sheep that isn't officially used anywhere yet). Frisk (talk) 00:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ahhh makes sense, but blender!? that's so cool!

also hi frisk undertale!!! how's frisk deltarune,,,, Bartomelow (talk) 00:54, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yup, Blender, the sheep had learn how to walk properly somehow!

Hah, part of the reason I wanted to respond here was so to see if I'll get that response, I'm not disappointed ;) Frisk (talk) 00:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

haha, you know who you we're talking didn't cha XD! Bartomelow (talk) 00:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

also, is the A Minecraft Movie background one made in blender? Bartomelow (talk) 00:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey o/ Frisk mentioned all my current toolset that I use, as for movie namespace - final assets were composed in Krita, but some sub-assets (like flowers and grass tiles) were modeled, textured and rendered in Blender. Oakar567 (talk) 15:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Formal process for appealing an indefinite block

Latest comment: 30 March15 comments6 people in discussion

Just curious - is there any formal process for appealing an indefinite block, like on Wikipedia you can contact the Arbitration comittee or use Unblock Ticket Request System? Arina (she/her) 08:21, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not directly a formal process, but the user talk page is the general place to start. Should that access be restricted as well, using Special:Contact can be used as well. --

MarkusRost (talk) 12:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The problem there is that no administrator is likely to come across a blocked user's appeal unless that user's talk page is on the administrator's watch list.

What we do on Wikipedia is provide instructions in the block message to appeal the block using a specific template, which includes the user talk page in a category page that admins monitor. All links that follow are on Wikipedia.

The generic block message is Template:Uw-block. It instructs the user to compose an appeal using the markup {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. That template is Template:Unblock. When the user does this, the appeal template adds the user's talk page to the page Category:Requests for unblock. We don't need the detailed tables shown on that category page, just the list of talk pages that contain an unresolved appeal would be sufficient, just like any other category page.

It's a fairly simple and straightforward process. It just needs a couple of templates and a category page. Oh, and an information page like Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks is helpful to guide users in composing a successful appeal. We likely don't need something as detailed as that.

Administrators regularly patrol that category page and respond to appeals. When I see an appeal that I think is good enough to warrant unblocking, the standard practice is to notify the blocking administrator first for agreement to unblock. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:13, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

While that is certainly an good process for Wikipedia, nothing like that is needed here. The wiki isn't nearly as active so talk page messages are less likely to be missed. We also only rarely issue blocks that could reasonably be appealed, with most blocks being vandalism-only accounts or LTAs. Blocks of constructive users are very much the exception, in which case the admin should add the user talk page to their watchlist. Template:Unblock itself has been deleted multiple times before and was mainly used by LTAs. --

MarkusRost (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have to disagree. While Minecraft Wiki is far from size of Wikipedia, it is still one of the bigger wiki sites in wiki spheres. Last month we have seen ~896 active accounts participating on the wiki, In last 60 days there were around 358 block logs generated, out of which 87 were indefinite bans, and 144 logs mention disabled talk page access (there is some over-represented statistical error due to me doing a very simple copy-paste/find lookup here). This is a pretty big amount of bans, and especially considering IP ranges blocked by abuse filters we have high chance of hitting some constructive users.

When user is hit with indefinite block they are not expected to come back as per Wiki rules, however I think it's only rational that some users may want to come back without breaking the rules. In those cases it is my belief they should have any "legal" avenue of appealing the block. I don't disagree that majority of requests would still be denied, because as mentioned LTAs may often abuse the appeal process, but I feel like lack of legal avenue of appealing blocks, especially in case of indefinite blocks (like in case of StizzurpXDD) makes the system unjust for users who may want to come back and start anew. Just my two cents. Frisk (talk) 13:33, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(there is also no question that administration team/CATS can make mistakes, we are fallible) Frisk (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As mentioned in my initial comment, blocked users are still pointed to their user talk page (as well as the Discord) when blocked. We just don't have a formal policy and templates for how to request an unblock. --

MarkusRost (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Again, this is not always a possibility for the user because talk page block is a case that we apply fairly frequently making it impossible for those users to appeal without socking. Discord - as shown recently, is not good enough to do that either, since there seems to be a shift in how Discord server is moderated that assumes that a banned user on the wiki is no longer welcome on Discord server as well.

Those circumstances highlight the need for more formal process that could address those issues. Frisk (talk) 18:07, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Exactly. It is a simple thing to create a block message template, a block appeal template, and a category page. The "we are not Wikipedia" excuse to avoid a simple process doesn't make sense when the processes on Wikipedia have been honed over more years by a much larger community. What I described isn't even a formal process, it's just a couple of convenience templates.

The current state of affairs encourages socking. That's unacceptable. I'm an administrator, and I can't put every user's talk page on my watchlist. That isn't practical. Having a category page to monitor (or better still, transcluding that page into a section at MCW:ADMIN) would greatly enhance responsiveness to block appeals. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:09, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

True. Surely people should have the option to appeal without socking, which is currently not possible, especially when (or at least how I see it) an IP could make two "vandalism" edits and then get blocked indefinitely, with no talk page access. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 02:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

IPs aren't blocked indefinitely. Arina (she/her) 08:00, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Some IPs are blocked indefinitely, but usually they aren't.

NmF (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not on English Minecraft Wiki (Special:BlockList), only a single IP address is blocked indefinitely, and it belongs to documentation IP range that cannot be used by anyone. Frisk (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm only stating my perspective, and to me it seems that accounts are indeffed often, so that's why I'm saying that. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 14:12, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Accounts can be indef-blocked, but not IP addresses. When an account is blocked, there is an option to block the underlying IP address also, but that IP address block isn't indef even if the account block is indef. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:19, 30 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Revisiting an old idea of mine

Latest comment: 23 March3 comments2 people in discussion

So, in January I proposed to add some code to {{upcoming}} and {{until}} to add categories specific to particular versions. This would allow these templates to be removed much faster, because it would be so much simpler. The full code is in a subpage of my sandbox, but basically it would expand things like "je 1.22" or "combat tests" to "Java Edition 1.22" or "Java Edition Combat Tests". This would be used to add categories such as "Upcoming Java Edition 1.22" to pages transcluding the templates I have mentioned. Should this be added, or would this be unnecessary? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 18:45, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maybe there could be a category for Upcoming Templates Pending Removal or something for after the version has come out and the pages with it will be put in it.

NmF (talk) 18:59, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So... You're saying that once the update comes out, the category page would be created, which would put the pages in the category? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 19:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hydrated ghast

Latest comment: 23 March1 comment1 person in discussion

needs to have a link 2601:1C0:5900:4060:E9C0:7553:3DDC:9521 18:53, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

On the main page all pages that are rendered must have a preview image

Latest comment: 24 March3 comments2 people in discussion

On the main page all pages that are rendered must have a preview image that shows the topic covered. for example, when I approach the mob page it should show a thumbnail of all the mobs. in some pages this is not there. LoweredgamesDev (talk) 19:28, 23 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is because the page may not have a thumbnail image. You can check it on the "Page information" on the left sidebar under "Tools" section. You can insert a thumbnail image by simply putting an image on the very top of the page. Outrowed (talk) 06:11, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

thanks LoweredgamesDev (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Allay Days

Latest comment: 29 March2 comments2 people in discussion

I Would Very Much Appreciate If This Page Was Added, If You Plan To Create This Page, Please Notify Me. 70.185.134.126 09:15, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you create an account and stop typing everything in title case, then people could more easily notify you and communicate with you. There's no guarantee that the IP address you posted from would still be associated with you in the future. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hide movie spoilers

Latest comment: 28 March3 comments2 people in discussion

So, since the movie is about to come out, is there a way to use my common.css to somehow hide content in the movie namespace so that I don't get spoilers? I'm not too certain how it would work, but I mean, I'm kind of just hoping there's a way... -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 00:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Here you go: User:Violine1101/common.css#L-100 - this blacks out the content of all movie namespace articles, and also blacks out links to movie articles in recent changes and similar. Note: Use at your own risk, it can be quite disorienting. | violine1101 ^(talk) 01:08, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 01:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Minecraft Spicewood… what could it be?

Latest comment: 1 April6 comments3 people in discussion

We learned about the leaked Minecraft Spicewood. But could it really be a dungeons’ sequel? 173.23.166.192 01:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This wiki isn't the place to engage in speculation. Go to Reddit for that. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:55, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK 173.23.166.192 01:19, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why are you angry? Arina (she/her) 08:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I provided factual information without any emotion at all. Why would you think I am angry? ~Anachronist (talk) 09:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chill out people 173.23.166.192 01:24, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bedrock flying machines

Latest comment: 1 April3 comments3 people in discussion

I want Bedrock players to have a way to flying machines that work in Bedrock. 2600:4040:E0DD:4500:F875:E5A7:DF47:A8CF 13:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see Tutorial:Flying_machines#Bedrock_engine_designs. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk)(contribs)

14:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It won’t matter once summer comes, happy ghastly will eliminate them 173.23.166.192 01:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

item.spawn_egg.name

Latest comment: 1 April1 comment1 person in discussion

item.spawn_egg.name Is A Placeholder In Bedrock Edition, Type "/Give <Your Username> spawn_egg 51" Replace <Your Username> With Your Username On Education And Theres A Chance For You To Get It 2606:A800:C191:AB00:0:0:0:F2B1 14:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Resolve feedback

Latest comment: 1 April13 comments4 people in discussion

Feedback is implemented as a way to help editors, not as a list of things that need to be addressed immediately. We are all here doing what we can. Due to edit warring this topic is now closed. If anyone reopens it they will be partially blocked.Mudscape - talk 21:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

40 entries of unresolved feedback. Arina (she/her) 18:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Capopanzo, @MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 and @violine1101 as frequent feedback resolvers. Arina (she/her) 18:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also @BrianGLHF. Arina (she/her) 18:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don’t understand this post that I’m tagged in. -BrianGLHF (talk) 18:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Resolve feedback. Arina (she/her) 18:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Arina -- I don't really feel like your bold demands are in the spirit of the Minecraft Wiki, it's community or any wiki for that matter. Good luck! -BrianGLHF (talk) 19:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks like a you issue if you see any "demands" in my messages. That was just a reminder. Arina (she/her) 20:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is no reminder here or even the word "please". Try using your words. All the best! -BrianGLHF (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Down to 34. Arina (she/her) 18:21, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's completely fine that there's a bunch of feedback that's unresolved. Most of the feedback that is left needs a bit of time to work on - and it's ok to leave it until somebody has the time; after all it's still being tracked, which is the point of this feature. | violine1101 ^(talk) 18:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

34 entries aren't "a bunch". Arina (she/her) 18:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That doesn't change the meaning or validity of my statement. | violine1101 ^(talk) 18:28, 1 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Subcategory for title screenshots

Latest comment: 4 April12 comments6 people in discussion

Category:Menu screenshots currently lists screenshots of different menu screens, as well as screenshots of the Title screen from every version. The latter is massively overwhelming the category, making it difficult to navigate through it when finding screenshots of other menu screens. I suggest to create a subcategory Category:Title screenshots or Category:Title screens and move all title screenshots there. But I'm not sure whether to subcategorize this further into title screenshots for every edition or leave it there. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk)(contribs) 10:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If no one opposes, I'll create Category:Title screenshots and request a bot to re-categorize all files. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk)(contribs)

10:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I strongly recommend waiting for a week before renaming massively. So far you've only got one support.

Wilf233_zhMCW（论·功） 11:50, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright, then the first 80 screenshots I moved are as an 'example'. MinecraftBedrockPlayer7 (talk)(contribs)

11:52, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support, but I don't think this change even needs a discussion. Arina (she/her) 11:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support. - Ssysi - talk 11:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Outrowed (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Should we split title screenshots category into JE and BE

Miner(

talk

contributions) 12:51, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I recommend split to JE, BE, and LCE. For other legacy editions (Pi Edition, 3DS Edition, who knows what), we simply put it "generally" on Category:Title screenshots. Outrowed (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What about EE?

Miner(

talk

contributions) 13:25, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh yeah, that too. Any editions that are not discontinued are notable enough to have their own category, IMO. LCE, even though discontinued, are not derivatives of other editions (like how Pi and 3DS are derivatives of Pocket Edition, and then turned into BE) and their UIs are very iconic on their own to be notable. Outrowed (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We may need a template to auto categorize based on file names.

Wilf233_zhMCW（论·功） 15:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Simple question

Latest comment: 5 April11 comments3 people in discussion

(I don't know what to title this...)

Anyways, so I'm try to make it so that a page could have a different appearance depending on the user viewing it. I tried {{Special:Mypage}}, but that didn't work. Is there some sort of magic word or something that displays the username of the user viewing it? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 14:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Currently no, but I don't think it would be hard to implement. The caveat is that it would be done only when the page is displayed(for technical reasons), meaning you couldn't change the page appearance aside from just inserting the username in a sentence. Mudscape talk 14:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hmm. Why exactly wouldn't it be able to interact with parser functions? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 14:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because when the page is parsed by the server it doesn't know who is going to be viewing it. The server only parses pages when page content changes, not every time the page is viewed. Mudscape talk 15:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Doesn't transcluding Special:Editcount purge the page on page load? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 15:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That transclusion will cause the page to be reparsed fairly often, but thats different from reparsing on every user. If you had to reparse a page for every user then there would be a noticeable delay to page loading. Mudscape talk 15:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can we use JavaScript? There is a function that returns the current user's username: mw.user.getName() — Hoangminhle2011 — Shape our MCW 15:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes this is the solution I was thinking of using. The JavaScript would apply on page load, so it won't be usable in parser functions. Mudscape talk 15:10, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How would I put this in a page? Would it be {{#invoke: mw.user.getName()}} or sth? -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 15:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It would have to be added by an admin as a JavaScript gadget Mudscape talk 15:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah. That makes sense. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 15:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How do I upscale a mob icon?

Latest comment: 7 April5 comments4 people in discussion

Moved from Forum:How do I upscale a mob icon?

How do I upscale an icon for a mob with a texture of 8x8 pixels and NOT make it look ugly? – Unsigned comment added by 4ngryth3fan (talk • contribs) at 14:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC). Please sign comments with ~~~~Reply[reply]

@4ngryth3fan Forum is not right place for small questions. You can use class=pixel-image for that. For example: [[File:CreeperFace.png|width=500|class=pixel-image]]

Miner(

talk

contributions) 16:20, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Where do I put this topic if this is not the right place? 4ngryth3fan (talk) 17:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They moved it for you here from the forum. It's in the "right place" now. :) -BrianGLHF (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah, post small questions here, aka the community portal. The forum is for large, complex discussions. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 03:47, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Friendly reminder about moving pages

Latest comment: 8 April1 comment1 person in discussion

Tl;Dr: remember to check for double redirects when moving pages!

Full message: Hello fellow editors. In the past I've fixed numerous double redirects (redirects targeting other redirects), and recently I've also sent some messages about it. Especially since there are a lot of these redirects at the moment, I thought I'd provide a reminder for the general editor community, and not just the users I've messaged as well as WikiJaguars like myself. Anyway, basically, when moving pages and leaving redirects, remember to check Special:DoubleRedirects for any DRs that might have been created by the page move. These should generally be avoided, especially in the content spaces where readers might find these. These might cause confusion among readers and inexperienced editors, because these are the ones that don't know about redirects. Other namespaces in which DRs are problematic may include File, Template, and Category. This is due to the fact that these are namespaces that have content transcluded or used similarly. Other namespaces (User, Minecraft Wiki, etc) aren't as problematic, as they are either not viewed often or used mainly by editors. Anyways, good day to you all. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 23:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is it true?

Latest comment: 9 April2 comments2 people in discussion

Isn't it true that users should not reveal their age if they are under 13, as this will cause them to be banned from the wiki?

If they're underage, they shouldn't show their age for good reasons.

Also, if a user is found to be under 13, they will be blocked until the day they turn 13? (unless they also engage in some form of disruptive behavior).

And even if a unblock request is sent later, will there be exceptions (Like if the age was accidentally set?) 74.201.73.194 01:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A related topic has already been discussed previously about personal information guidelines for minors. Outrowed (talk) 01:52, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Upcoming and until for drops

Latest comment: 10 April3 comments2 people in discussion

How do I use {{upcoming}} and {{until}} for game drops? If I type {{upcoming|summer drop 2025}} it just shows ^{[upcoming drop 2025]}, so is there a way to fix it? Or do I just have to type {{upcoming|je 1.21.6|be 1.21.80}}? --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 03:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It has not been implemented yet, the template code... is a mess, but I can see we cannot use the game drops as the upcoming parameter. Unfortunately, the template is protected so that directors can only edit, in meanwhile, you may use {{upcoming|je 1.21.6|be 1.21.80}}. Outrowed (talk) 10:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, ok then. Thanks. --MinecraftExp123^{(talk|contribs)} 11:16, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Marathon Extravaganza Day of Awesomeness

Latest comment: 10 April2 comments2 people in discussion

I may be considerably to blame for this, but as the wiki is currently, many maintenance categories are overflowing with claims needing checked, especially for historical details. Category:Information needed, for example, contains over 650 entries.

To resolve this, could we as a community dedicate certain days to testing things en-masse and filling in these gaps in information? The MCDF wiki already does this with WMEDA events, so I think this idea could work here as well provided enough people are willing to collectively put in the effort. - User-12316399 (talk) 10:17, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think this idea has potential. We'd probably have a page for it with a central discussion place for it, and then we could go crazy on it! I know that I'd be able to upload lots of MCL files. -~- Nerdyguy2000 Talk Edits 14:16, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mini-Series

Latest comment: 10 April1 comment1 person in discussion

Even though the mini-series came out a long time ago and people forgot about it, I think it is necessary to create a separate namespace for it, so that the pages about the series do not conflict with the pages about the game content. Also can create a Mini-Series:Wiki page, similar to the Wiki pages of other Minecraft projects, so that new people can learn about it. Buzzilaa (talk) 16:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@@ Line 573: / Line 573: @@
 :I think this idea has potential. We'd probably have a page for it with a central discussion place for it, and then we could go crazy on it! I know that I'd be able to upload lots of MCL files. -~-<b style="border:2px solid #0ef"> [[User:Nerdyguy2000|Nerdyguy2000]] </b>&nbsp;<b style="border:2px solid #ef0"> [[User talk:Nerdyguy2000|Talk]] </b>&nbsp;<b style="border:2px solid #f0e"> [[Special:Contribs/Nerdyguy2000|Edits]]&nbsp;</b> 14:16, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
+== Mini-Series ==
+Even though the mini-series came out a long time ago and people forgot about it, I think it is necessary to create a separate namespace for it, so that the pages about the series do not conflict with the pages about the game content. Also can create a Mini-Series:Wiki page, similar to the Wiki pages of other Minecraft projects, so that new people can learn about it. [[User:Buzzilaa|Buzzilaa]] ([[User talk:Buzzilaa|talk]]) 16:30, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Minecraft Wiki talk:Community portal: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:30, 10 April 2025

List default item components in item articles

Uploading enchanted item textures

Latin translation

How to add a photo to your account

Page delete

Interactive viewer for panoramas

Interactive Langton's Ant demo

Naming scheme for Minecraft Live pages

View MCW #en/editors feed with a Zulip account

Deletion request

Name changing

External links in navboxes

please restart hungarian translation project

Question from a newbie

Uploaded my first image

MC Dungeons texture filenames

Changing button icon in MediaViewer

Something was update from zh

Potential Concept redesign?

Idea for new calculator

Drawing attention to a discussion

Please see...

rv test edit

Block Renders Copyright Question

Self Nominating for Patroller Rights

Cs wiki does not work

AI-generated replies?

How can i extract entity models from version games files and convert them to bbmodels

Isn't this user a long-term abuser?

Image for return button on mouse

Condensing archives?

How do I make isometric screenshots like the ones that are seen throughout the wiki?

Movie sprites

Wiki background

Formal process for appealing an indefinite block

Revisiting an old idea of mine

hydrated ghast

On the main page all pages that are rendered must have a preview image

Allay Days

Hide movie spoilers

Minecraft Spicewood… what could it be?

Bedrock flying machines

item.spawn_egg.name

Resolve feedback

Subcategory for title screenshots

Simple question

How do I upscale a mob icon?

Friendly reminder about moving pages

Is it true?

Upcoming and until for drops

Wiki Marathon Extravaganza Day of Awesomeness

Mini-Series

Navigation menu