→Allow explanations of references in advancement titles
(→Allow explanations of references in advancement titles: Weak support) |
BDJP007301 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 466:
: {{c|Weak support}}. I do not like speculation on wikis and I fully get why the reference subsection was removed. Yet, I reckon that an exception for advancements and achievements could be made as long as it's kept under a subsection, stated using the conditional tense rather than the affirmative tense (unlike what it used to be) and somehow moderated enough so that far-fetched speculations are not added among the obvious references (which is the most challenging point to enforce and what leads me not to fully support the proposal). - [[User:Zamburger|Zamburger]] ([[User talk:Zamburger|talk]]) 16:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
: {{c|Oppose}}. I stand by that any references in advancement names must be sourced to a Mojang employee. '''[[User:BDJP007301|BDJP]]''' <sup>([[User talk:BDJP007301|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/BDJP007301|c]])</sup> 00:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
| |||