→Allow explanations of references in advancement titles: Weak support
(→Allow explanations of references in advancement titles: Weak support) |
|||
Line 464:
::Good Idea! We can do the same. -- [[File:StizzurpXDD Transparent BG.png|24px|text-top|link=]] '''<span style="color:#ADFF2F; text-shadow:0 0 5px #05B7B9, 0 0 10px #05B7B9, 0 0 15px #05B7B9; font-family: Minecraft;">StizzurpXDD</span>'''<sup>([[User talk:StizzurpXDD|'''talk''']])</sup> 15:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:: This was the case on the English wiki as well until it was removed a few years ago. - [[User:Zamburger|Zamburger]] ([[User talk:Zamburger|talk]]) 16:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
: {{c|Weak support}}. I do not like speculation on wikis and I fully get why the reference subsection was removed. Yet, I reckon that an exception for advancements and achievements could be made as long as it's kept under a subsection, stated using the conditional tense rather than the affirmative tense (unlike what it used to be) and somehow moderated enough so that far-fetched speculations are not added among the obvious references (which is the most challenging point to enforce and what leads me not to fully support the proposal). - [[User:Zamburger|Zamburger]] ([[User talk:Zamburger|talk]]) 16:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
| |||