→Split proposal?: Reply
BDJP007301 (talk | contribs) |
QuickWhitt7 (talk | contribs) (→Split proposal?: Reply) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 6:
::No speculation, mostly raw discussion and dissection about the syntax of the advancements JSON files. – [[User:Calmbit|Calmbit]] ([[User talk:Calmbit|talk]]) 01:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
::: In addition, {{ping|Skylinerw}} has some great info on the new advancements in his post on the Forums: http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/minecraft-discussion/redstone-discussion-and/command-blocks/2809368-1-12-custom-advancements-aka-achievements - it would be great if this wiki page could be fleshed out more. <span class="nowrap">–[[User:Goandgoo|<b style="color:#282">Goandgoo</b>]] ᐸ <small style="display:inline-block;line-height:1em;vertical-align:-0.4em">[[User talk:Goandgoo|Talk]]<br>[[Special:Contribs/Goandgoo|Contribs]]</small></span> 10:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey guys, did anyone notice the "bring a ghast '''home'''" to the overworld? maybe in trivia?
Line 82:
There's a lot of conditions available and the tree is too big. Isn't it possible to hide compound's content by default? It allows people to only see full data of specific conditions without having to scroll forever. I tried something on my [http://minecraft.gamepedia.com/User:Mlakuss?profile=no personal page], but there may be better solutions. --[[User:Mlakuss|Mlakuss]] ([[User talk:Mlakuss|talk]]) 09:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
:See [[Talk:Advancement#Conditions|Talk:Advancements#Conditions]]. --[[User:PepijnMC|Pepijn]] ([[User talk:PepijnMC|talk]]) 11:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
== Trigger and conditions list ==
Line 468:
: {{c|Oppose}}. I stand by that any references in advancement names must be sourced to a Mojang employee. '''[[User:BDJP007301|BDJP]]''' <sup>([[User talk:BDJP007301|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/BDJP007301|c]])</sup> 00:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:: Are you not going to engage with the point of splashes at all? Those aren't sourced, yet are kept up. Why shouldn't the same thing apply here? You seem to be pointlessly adament on not making an exception despite us having done so already for another page. Would it kill us to provide some helpful context for advancement titles? It's honestly stranger to not have it, a lot of the time people go to wikis to see trivia like this, and I can definitely imagine a lot of users wanting to see advancement title references. I myself went to the page seeking it, and was shocked to see nothing. - [[User:BD|BD]] ([[User talk:BD|talk]]) 00:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
::: The reason why splashes were given an exception is that some references to those are obvious and unambiguous behind a reasonable doubt. '''[[User:BDJP007301|BDJP]]''' <sup>([[User talk:BDJP007301|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/BDJP007301|c]])</sup>
== 1.20.5's experimental changes for 1.21 aren't in their own section ==
The title says it all. I tried editing the source and I noticed that the <code>dev</code> and <code>exp</code> fields (I don't know if they're actually called fields, but I'm calling them that) were in the opposite order compared to how they were for 1.20.3's 1.21 experiments. I tried changing the order, but previewing the edit showed no change. Upon closer examination of the other "experimental" sections I noticed that 1.20.5 was the only update which had other advancement changes as well as the experimental changes. Could this be an issue with the way these tables are coded? [[User:Davie53|Davie53]] ([[User talk:Davie53|talk]]) 21:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
:There was an oversight on how experimental versions are applied in the history section. I think it will be a quick fix, I will work on it now. [[User:Mudscape|Mudscape]] ([[User talk:Mudscape|talk]]) 21:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
:This is now fixed, thank you for the report! [[User:Mudscape|Mudscape]] ([[User talk:Mudscape|talk]]) 22:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
:I know this is irrelevant, but those things ({{cd|dev}} and {{cd|exp}}) are called parameters, not fields. --[[User:MinecraftExp123|MinecraftExp123]]<sup>([[User talk:MinecraftExp123|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/MinecraftExp123|contribs]])</sup> 01:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
== Split proposal? ==
{{@|User-12316399}} I don't understand why this page should be split. Singular advancements do not have enough info to warrant a full page, as per [[MCW:N#General]] rule 1. The only information is what triggers it, which as shown in the page, it literally only takes at most one paragraph. Please explain. --[[User:MinecraftExp123|MinecraftExp123]]<sup>([[User talk:MinecraftExp123|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/MinecraftExp123|contribs]])</sup> 11:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
:I agree. [[File:AYAANFACE.png|20x20px|class=pixel-image|link=https://minecraft.wiki/w/User:Ayaan]] [[User:Ayaan|<span style="font-family:Minecraft; background: linear-gradient(90deg, #46beff, #419aee); -webkit-background-clip: text; color: transparent; text-shadow: 2px 2px 5px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);">Ayaan</span>]] 11:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
:I also concur and am against the split proposal. <span style="font-family: Minecraft; color: purple;">[[User:QuickWhitt7|QuickWhitt7]] ([[User talk:QuickWhitt7|Talk]])</span> 11:35, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
| |||